A Victory without Time to Celebrate: The Challenges for Mexico’s First Female President
From major infrastructure projects, such as a new airport for Mexico City, to a reduction in poverty, Mexico’s outgoing president, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, leaves a considerable – if often controversial – legacy. However, with a depreciating peso as well as tensions with Mexico’s main trading partners, his successor, Claudia Sheinbaum, faces numerous challenges as she begins her term in office.
In the elections held on Sunday 2 June 2024, Mexicans overwhelmingly expressed their confidence in the political coalition led by the National Regeneration Movement (Morena) to govern the country for a second consecutive six-year term. Claudia Sheinbaum, the winning candidate, defeated her opponent, Xóchitl Gálvez (the candidate from the PRI-PAN-PRD coalition), by 33 points (60% to 27%). In a world where incumbents have limited prospects for re-election (since 2019, only five out of 23 incumbent governments in Latin America have succeeded in obtaining a second term), such a broad electoral victory merits further explanation. Furthermore, due to the high level of electoral support for the coalition’s candidate, the new government will enjoy a broad majority in the Chamber of Deputies and is just two senators short of achieving the qualified majority needed to pass constitutional reforms without negotiating with the opposition parties. In this context, analysts’ fears of a government capable of undermining the pluralism inherent in a democratic regime do not seem so exaggerated. But let’s take it one step at a time.
Causes of the Election Victory
The government of Andrés Manuel López Obrador (often referred to by his initials, AMLO) was the first self-declared leftist administration to come to power following the democratisation process in the 1990s. In this sense, AMLO sought to address the social debt owed to the low-income majority in one of the most unequal democracies in the world.
Since his election in 2018, approximately 70% of the population has seen improvements in their income, and more than five million people have been lifted out of poverty, thanks to the minimum wage policy and to government social programmes (Inegi, 2024; CONEVAL, 2024).
AMLO combined this increase in social spending with a policy of fiscal austerity, which helped maintain macroeconomic stability and also led to substantial gains for the financial sectors as well as for the producers of consumer goods, given the increased purchasing power of the middle and lower sectors of the economy. Finally, AMLO undertook major infrastructure projects: a second airport for the Metropolitan Zone of the Valley of Mexico, an oil refinery to reduce fuel imports, the Maya Train to promote economic development in the Yucatán Peninsula, and the Transoceanic Corridor, a rail and road corridor between the Pacific and the Gulf of Mexico to improve connectivity between oceans. According to the official narrative, these projects will be crucial for less dependency in international trade, and for the economic growth of historically neglected regions of the country.
In summary, despite incredibly high levels of violence from organised crime and continued impunity for its perpetrators, most voters appreciate that, for the first time in decades, the government is strengthening Mexico’s sovereignty and focusing on the welfare of its less privileged majority.
Institutional Risks of a Supermajority Presidency
While the 2024 elections confirmed the direction set in 2018, turbulent times are anticipated. The first concern relates to the real possibility of democratic erosion. Since, in Mexico, the elected legislature takes office a month before the new president’s inauguration, a supermajority Congress will coexist for a month with AMLO’s presidency. This makes it possible for him to enact two constitutional reforms that the previous Congress and the Supreme Court had rejected on several occasions: an electoral reform, which seeks to change how electoral councillors, responsible for organising elections, are appointed, and a judicial reform, which proposes the popular election of judges and magistrates. Both proposals politicise appointments at institutions designed to control power, and thus threaten the checks and balances envisioned in the separation of powers.
Current Political Consequences and Future Questions
In democracy, anyone who tests the limits, eventually finds them. Major financial players and the governments of Canada and the United States, Mexico’s main trade partners, have expressed their disagreement with the government’s ambitions. The persistent depreciation of the peso against the dollar in recent months (see graph 2) and the declines on the Mexican Stock Exchange are unmistakable signs that, in democratic capitalism, when controlling power becomes difficult from within, it is done from the outside, either by civil society or market forces.
Looking forwards: will Claudia Sheinbaum support a move against control institutions that could create economic turbulence and thus affect public finances? Will the new president be able to distance herself from her mentor and former political boss, to build her own platform without incurring his enmity? The answers to these questions will largely determine the future of her administration. The “narrow corridor” may lead to paradise, but in the short term, it can also be the most challenging to take.
Results of the elections of 2 June 2024
Presidential, legislative and senatorial elections
Claudia Sheinbaum (MORENA: left-wing) was elected President of the Republic with 59.8% of the vote against two other candidates, including Xóchitl Gálvez (National Action Party: conservative right, economic liberals; 27.5%). The MORENA party and its allies won a large absolute majority of seats in both houses of Congress.
Note: As a president can only serve one term, outgoing President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (MORENA) was not eligible for re-election.
Source: Wikipedia
Sources: Perspective Monde (sources: The Economist, Highcharts.com [map], © Natural Earth); Our World in Data; Wikipedia. Map produced by Whybe.
GRAPH: Increase in the Number of Elections (Legislative and Presidential) since 1800
Source: Wikipedia
BOX: For or Against Electronic Voting?
The elections in Venezuela on 28 July 2024 added fuel to an ongoing debate: for or against electronic voting? Technology is becoming increasingly important in the organisation of elections: for the compilation and purging of voter lists, the planning of polling stations, the sending of results and the counting of votes. While there is agreement on the advantages of its use for these tasks, electronic voting remains controversial: those in favour point out that it brings speed (fast counting) and efficiency (the procedure reduces the incidence of invalidated votes due to errors). Opponents warn that legal security is at stake in terms of the secrecy of the vote (voters often need help to use the machines), transparency is lost (anyone can supervise the paper count but specialised knowledge is needed to understand how the machine works) and it generates dependence on the private sector (which takes over the logistics for large sums of money).
In Latin America, some countries have electronic voting systems (Brazil, Venezuela) or have implemented pilot programmes (Mexico), while others maintain the paper ballot (Argentina, Uruguay). Regardless of the system, allegations of fraud have become part of the electoral strategy of some leaders such as Donald Trump in the United States, Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil (both with electronic voting) or Keiko Fujimori in Peru (paper ballot). In none of them has it been judicially proven. In any case, the transparency and “auditability” of the electoral system becomes central.
Source: Yanina Welp, “El voto electrónico venezolano”, El Universal, 21 August 2024.
BOX: What are the different voting systems?
There are three voting systems: majority, proportional and mixed. Voting may be direct (as in the presidential election) or indirect (as in the senatorial election). They may comprise a single round or several rounds:
- Majority systems are the oldest: the winner of the election takes all the seats at stake. This is known as “first past the post”. These elections make it easier to create a stable and coherent majority to govern, at the risk of under-representing minority opinions. They also guarantee a close link between elected representatives and voters. They may be single-member (a single seat to be filled) or multi-member (several seats);
- In proportional representation systems, the seats are distributed between the various candidates in proportion to the votes obtained. Proportional systems developed in the 20th century: Belgium was the first country to introduce proportional representation for its parliamentary elections (1899), followed by Finland (1906), Denmark (1915), the Netherlands (1917) and Germany (1919). These systems ensure better representation of the various currents of opinion, at the risk of complicating the emergence of a governing majority and strengthening the influence of political parties;
- Mixed systems combine the two systems: for the same election, some candidates are elected under the majority system (in small constituencies) and others under the proportional system (in larger constituencies). This is the case, for example, with municipal elections in France: the majority system applies in municipalities with fewer than 1,000 inhabitants, and the proportional system in municipalities with 1,000 inhabitants or more.
Source: Mathieu Mugnier, “La diversité des modes de scrutin”, Vie publique, 23 October 2024.